I don't think it's whether it's explicit, I think about how much focus there is on it. For example, your first six points are really focused on pro-eugenic arguments for IQ. The last four get off onto, I don't want to say distractions, but disconnected arguments. I'm not sure why a pro-eugenics community cares about economic systems anymore than why it would have a stance on tax policy. It feels like CW seeping in.
Maybe it's a difference in style but I think the core argument is pretty simple for, let's call it, non-coercive IQ eugenics (NCIE).
#1 We're at the edge of a revolution where genetic engineering will become practical for the first time through preimplantation screening.
#2 The primary focus of genetic engineering should be to boost intelligence/IQ/g. This is the most important single attribute to improve in human beings. It has the biggest impact and no negative side effects.
#3 By impact, we mean the ability to change the world. A world in which we eliminate cancer and several genetic disorders over 3 generations is better but it does not change the world the way a 30 IQ gain would. IQ/g has the most impact of any facet of human genetics.
#4 It has no negative side effects. Personality, for example, is heavily influenced by genetics but a lot of winning personality traits are zero-sum, as are physical beauty traits like height. These things are powerful but very, very difficult to get right. IQ, by contrast, is simple. Everyone should be smarter and there's no downside to any or all people getting smarter.
#5 This has immediate impacts on every living person and ideology. If you're worried about AI alignment, you want smarter people to solve it. If you want to solve death a la Bostrom, you definitely want smarter people. Even if I disagree with you and you're trying to shore up the Chinese Communist Party or institute better censorship regimes in the West, you should still want smarter people to enact those goals. Everyone, for their own selfish and/or ideological reasons, should support this.
#6 Therefore, right-rationalists/NCIE people should develop practical plans for members to be able to implement embryo selection for IQ/g for their own children in the next few years. As these children prove healthy and intelligent, these techniques should be popularized for the entire global population.
I'm not saying this is your thing, I kind of went of on a tangent there, but there's a dramatic difference in focus and discussion. Talk about the core important thing, in great depth, and don't get sidetracked. As a...persuasive manner, it's not what you say so much as how often you say it.
And let me say, if this is something you really want to dive in to, you're absolutely in the right spot. Embryo selection for IQ/g has been discussed for awhile but at some point, someone actually has to do it. If you can lay out reasonable steps for someone to actually do this, even at a cost of $20k-$50k/kid, I absolutely think you could find 20-50 people in the rationalist/post-rationalist world who would do it. I certainly would.
https://parrhesia.substack.com/p/rationalism-done-right/comment/11411431